Re: : FAT (in)secure ?
From: Lee Leahu (lee@ricis.com)Date: 02/28/02
- Previous message: Lee Leahu: "RE: MS02-012/Q313450"
- In reply to: Ronald Balk: ": FAT (in)secure ?"
- Next in thread: H C: "Re: : FAT (in)secure ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:02:07 -0600 To: <ronald.balk@DEVICEGLOBAL.COM>, <focus-ms@securityfocus.com> From: Lee Leahu <lee@ricis.com>
Two things come to mind.
First, FAT or FAT32 partitions *do not* support any type of security.
Second, The partition is a lot small by using FAT. you would have to load ntfs drivers, and verify a username / password before allowing access to
that partition if it were NTFS, which means you have to store that code somewhere else....and create a bigger mess.
At 11:02 2002-02-28, you wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>During the install on my HP Lxr8000 server in noticed that the HP
>Navigator CD creates a diagnotisc FAT partition. One of the first things
>
>todo to secure my W2k/IIS server is to format all partitions NTFS. Just
>wondering how (in)secure this FAT partition is or does anyone know were
>I can find some documentation about it.
>
>
>Kind regards,
>Ronald Balk
>Device Global BV
>+31 23 534 4300
>http://www.deviceglobal.com
>"Device adds innovative & guaranteed value to used IT products, with
>respect for people and the environment".
- Previous message: Lee Leahu: "RE: MS02-012/Q313450"
- In reply to: Ronald Balk: ": FAT (in)secure ?"
- Next in thread: H C: "Re: : FAT (in)secure ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|