RE: RE: RE: Possible hack - Portable profile found in a Windows 2K Pro SP1 station..
From: Jorge Roxo (j.roxo@sotagus.pt)Date: 02/08/02
- Previous message: Evans, TJ: "RE: Secure Transactions over HTTPS????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Jorge Roxo" <j.roxo@sotagus.pt> To: <focus-ms@securityfocus.com> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:30:52 -0000
We thanks to Pascal Longpre who pointed us out into the right direction
with this subject.. We checked the local machine for the user of
PCAnywhere and found out that it was trojaned. Funny enough the attack
that seemed simple was actually quite complex, it went as it follows:
1.- Attacker trojaned PCAnywhere caller...
2.- Sat and listened for conections made...
3.- Found our conection and how to get into the system...
4.- Tried unsuccessfully to gain administrator rights in our machine as
well as a failed attempt to place a trojan in our machine. Tried as well
to access the network and the servers to install his profile as a memebr
of the administrator group which is not the builtin one in Windows 2000
but is quite well protected and failed.
5.- The 3o seconds conection timeout I had setup for the modem failed
misserably, and did not disconect the user.. So did the 3 minutes
timeout connection of PCAnywhere..
6.- Local security, group policies, and AV stopped the intruder from
accessing any data in the network or system..
My conclusions on this...
Well.. Thank god for our AV and the pains we've had to go through to
implement good, sound, and properly working security policies semm to
have payed off.
My main worry now is as follows... We are thinking on maybe creating
computer groups, and through them allowing those machines to operate on
X, Y or Z security level, thus even if a user is logged on as a domain
administrator or network admin, but is not logged on at his machine, he
would only have access to minor capabilities as determined by both the
admin profile and machine he uses. Mind you, the compter groups should
not be confused with workgroups bu rather make computer+user members of
a determinate group type, such as domain administrators, domain users,
server operators etc...
Anyone can see any problems here regarding security?... How good for
security is the implementation of personal access cards? Do they really
work? What are the security risks involved? Can they be externally
hacked?
Jorge Roxo,
TCSA/Sotagus Computer Systems Administrator
-------------------------------------------
This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please accept our apologies. Do not disclose, copy or
distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance to
its contents, to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it.
Thank you for your co-operation.
-------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Evans, TJ: "RE: Secure Transactions over HTTPS????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|