Re: Something about ISA Server 2000...
From: Deji (deji@prontomail.com)Date: 10/25/01
- Previous message: Bruce Marshall: "RE: Can Kerberos be cracked??"
- In reply to: Los, Ralph: "RE: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Next in thread: Ryan Permeh: "Re: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Next in thread: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Next in thread: cxnolke@regence.com: "Re: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Reply: Ryan Permeh: "Re: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <001c01c15d94$84c105f0$f701fe0a@commtouch.com> From: "Deji" <deji@prontomail.com> To: "Los, Ralph" <rlos@EnvestNet.com>, "'Progenit Service S.r.l.'" <agente_progenit@public.iunet.it>, <focus-ms@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: Something about ISA Server 2000... Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:35:00 -0700
Ralph, I noticed that you didn't elaborate on your dislike of ISA. I
personnaly use it and have been satisfied with it SO FAR. There are a couple
of things that may turn people off of it, I know. The biggest of this is
non-familiarity and the apparent difficulty in configuration. But those are
not things that should turn you off of a GOOD product. I am happy to say
that ISA kept all of my servers out of both Nimda and CodeRed's harm, even
where the patches were not present on the Web Servers.
I like ISA. When properly configured, it's solid. I bitch about things that
I would like to see in it, but so do my CheckPoint FW-1 colleagues. Another
plus, no KNOWN exploit exists for it yet.
Deji
p.s: I do NOT speak for MS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Los, Ralph" <rlos@EnvestNet.com>
To: "'Progenit Service S.r.l.'" <agente_progenit@public.iunet.it>;
<focus-ms@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:56 AM
Subject: RE: Something about ISA Server 2000...
> Giancarlo,
>
> Unfortunately, yes I have both experience and opinion. I started to
> play around with ISA 2000 a while ago, and now I run 3 CheckPoint FW-1's.
> Nothing beats a CheckPoint, in my book, BUT, Netscreen is a great little
> box, and Watchguard is worth the price as well for smaller offices.
>
> I'd stay away from ISA as a firewall, trust me, it's not something
> you want to have to deal with...<shudder>....and I'm a Microsoft fan.
>
> Regards
>
> Ralph M. Los
> Asst. Vice-President, Internet Systems and Security
> EnvestnetPMC
> rlos@envestnet.com
> (312) 827-3945 (direct)
> (312) 296-9003 (wireless w/voicemail)
> * If you haven't been hacked, you don't know where your vulnerabilities
lie*
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Progenit Service S.r.l. [mailto:agente_progenit@public.iunet.it]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:10 AM
> To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Something about ISA Server 2000...
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> has someone an opinion (good or bad....)concerning ISA Server 2000
installed
> as firewall? How many differences are among this software solution from
> Microsoft and Check Point Firewall-1, Netscreen 10/100, Watchguard or
Cisco
> PIX?
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Giancarlo Ballestracci
> Technical Support
> Progenit Service S.r.l. Agenzia TENOVIS-NEWTEL Telecommunications -
> Information Security - New Technologies Tel 055-456336 Fax 055-452330
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Bruce Marshall: "RE: Can Kerberos be cracked??"
- In reply to: Los, Ralph: "RE: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Next in thread: Ryan Permeh: "Re: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Next in thread: Laura A. Robinson: "Re: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Next in thread: cxnolke@regence.com: "Re: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Reply: Ryan Permeh: "Re: Something about ISA Server 2000..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|