Crazy ides about .exe isapi mappings
From: Mike Shaw (mshaw@wwisp.com)Date: 10/17/01
- Previous message: Adam Kujawski: "Re: NT Server - 98 WkStn Highschool Lab - Help!"
- Next in thread: Pidgorny, Slav: "RE: Crazy ides about .exe isapi mappings"
- Reply: Pidgorny, Slav: "RE: Crazy ides about .exe isapi mappings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20011017133558.00b1d240@mail.wwisp.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:46:04 -0500 To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com From: Mike Shaw <mshaw@wwisp.com> Subject: Crazy ides about .exe isapi mappings
In IIS, why not map .exe extensions to a non-existent or otherwise
hamstrung executable map?
This would prevent execution of cmd, net, tftp, etc. from directory
traversal exploits. I don't mean existing ones (where the server should be
patched) I mean the ones we may not know about.
-Mike
- Previous message: Adam Kujawski: "Re: NT Server - 98 WkStn Highschool Lab - Help!"
- Next in thread: Pidgorny, Slav: "RE: Crazy ides about .exe isapi mappings"
- Reply: Pidgorny, Slav: "RE: Crazy ides about .exe isapi mappings"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]