Re: URLscan overhead

From: akomolafe (deji@prontomail.com)
Date: 09/26/01 

Message-ID: <010f01c146a2$f09b2430$f701fe0a@commtouch.com>
From: "akomolafe" <deji@prontomail.com>
To: "Mark Fagan" <Mark.Fagan@esat.com>, "Focus-Ms (E-mail)" <focus-ms@securityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: URLscan overhead
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:50:17 -0700

The log is VERY "chatty" and gets big quite often. We had to move URLScan to
a larger partition, so it's not in the inetpub\wwwroot as suggested in the
readme.

As for overhead, we are still watching it like an eagle. We get quite a lot
of traffic, but we haven't noticed an extra-ordinary performance hit YET.

HTH

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Fagan" <Mark.Fagan@esat.com>
To: "Focus-Ms (E-mail)" <focus-ms@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:45 AM
Subject: URLscan overhead

> Anyone any ideas on increased load on servers implementing urlscan.
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
>
> http://www.esatbusiness.com
>
> **********************************************************************

Quantcast