Re: WIN2000 and IIS
From: Brian Baker (bbaker@ambassadorsolutions.com)Date: 08/28/01
- Previous message: Nathan.Reynolds@med.va.gov: "RE: Ms Proxy - concurrent access"
- In reply to: Mike Kennedy: "Re: WIN2000 and IIS"
- Next in thread: forrest whitcher: "Re: WIN2000 and IIS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <011e01c12fea$0959d720$df64af0a@stvincent.org> From: "Brian Baker" <bbaker@ambassadorsolutions.com> To: <focus-ms@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: WIN2000 and IIS Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:37:46 -0500
Mike:
Note that COM+ / Component Services itself does not require IIS -- it is the
COM Internet Services option. This, if I recall correctly, allows COM+
calls to be transported on top of HTTP, which would obviously show the need
for a web server.
Brian Baker
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Kennedy" <mikek@syrinx.ucr.edu>
To: "Margaret CTR Rhodes" <Margaret.CTR.Rhodes@faa.gov>
Cc: <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>; <focus-ms@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: WIN2000 and IIS
> This happened to me as well... this is because there are some components
> later on in the list, specifically COM that requires IIS to be installed.
> If you select these components IIS will be reselected for you. Nice
> feature huh?
- Previous message: Nathan.Reynolds@med.va.gov: "RE: Ms Proxy - concurrent access"
- In reply to: Mike Kennedy: "Re: WIN2000 and IIS"
- Next in thread: forrest whitcher: "Re: WIN2000 and IIS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
