RE: Accessing Exchange 2000 Remotely

From: Bob Buel (rbuel@asd-web.com)
Date: 08/17/01


From: "Bob Buel" <rbuel@asd-web.com>
To: <focus-ms@securityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: Accessing Exchange 2000 Remotely
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:57:45 -0500
Message-ID: <000a01c12756$e4e33210$170c650a@340023456>

Why don't you dual home your mail server with a NIC in your DMZ, and
limit it to ports (110 and 25)? There's not much damage (anything?) that
can be done with POP access limited this way, as long as there are no
web servers in the same DMZ with it.
Also, perhaps a better alternative would be to put your exchange server
in your DMZ, (since the internal network would be less directly
accessible) but then again, I would be concerned about the account data
and email that could be compromised.....
Just some thoughts!

Bob

  

-----Original Message-----
From: Byron Kennedy [mailto:byron@markettools.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:59 AM
To: 'Mark Parry'; Stephen K. Watling; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Accessing Exchange 2000 Remotely

Agreed. What about secure-pop (over ssl) until you get the VPN up?

Byron

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Parry [mailto:mark@firstworld.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 6:44 PM
To: Stephen K. Watling; focus-ms@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Accessing Exchange 2000 Remotely

I think you need a VPN.

Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen K. Watling" <steve.watling@neumark.com>
To: <focus-ms@securityfocus.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:47 PM
Subject: Accessing Exchange 2000 Remotely

We are running a MS Exchange 2000 server behind our firewall. We do not
have any problems with our users accessing it from within our LAN (of
course), however, we do have a number of employees who work remotely, at
least part of the time. In order to accommodate them, we enabled
Outlook Web Access across an SSL connection. Our remote users have
requested that we go a step further and enable POP3 access to the
system. Now, I am against doing this, because I question the security
aspects of this. I have suggested we enable IMAP4 over SSL to allow
remote access. However, our users are sticking to their guns on POP3
access. We are working on implementing VPN access, but due to
logistical constraints, we will not be able to implement it for a few
months. We would like to find an interim solution as soon as possible.
Question: What is the most secure/flexible method of accessing an
Exchange 2000 server from across the Internet? Is there a more secure
option that I just don't see?

Thank you in advance for your assistance,

Steve

Systems Engineer

Systems Engineer
Neumark Technology Group, Inc.
Phone: 630-505-3721
Fax: 630-505-4999
Mobile: 847-366-9088
steve.watling@neumark.com
www.neumark.com



Relevant Pages

  • RE: Webserver on a DMZ still needed?
    ... Certainly your suggestion to have a email server in a DMZ but still have ... having the exchange server on the internal LAN with only the smtp ports ... Talking of the financial cost of setup by the book vs the security cost ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: Webserver on a DMZ still needed?
    ... OWA server. ... Webserver on a DMZ still needed? ... It is still recommended to have your exchange box (and any other outward ... to interact securely with the Domain Controller on the secure subnet? ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: Netzschema
    ... Wenn du den SMTP Server in der DMZ zusätzlich auch als OWA Server verwenden möchtest, bedeutet das zwangsläufig, dass du Exchange installieren musst. ... Insofern braucht der DMZ Exchange auch entsprechende Zugriffe auf das AD. ... Denke an das Regelwerk, das nötig ist, um alleine den Intra-Domain-Traffic zu routen, zusätzlich zu den SMTP und Publishing-Regeln. ...
    (microsoft.public.de.german.isaserver)
  • Re: Netzschema
    ... Insofern braucht der DMZ Exchange auch entsprechende ... dass du durch den ISA Server etliche ... Stell doch deinen OWA Server in die Domain und publishe SMTP und OWA durch ...
    (microsoft.public.de.german.isaserver)
  • Re: Errors after a clean install of SBS2K3
    ... I meant Exchange 2K3 SP1. ... > I had to reinstall SBS 2K3 because of a faulty motherboard. ... > The following settings were successfully configured by the Remote Access ... > server provided with Windows Small Business Server 2003. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)