Re: Hacked NT/2K box
From: Thor@HammerofGod.comDate: 07/24/01
- Previous message: Ben Greenbaum: "SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #44"
- In reply to: Chris Lynch, MCSE CCNAv2: "RE: Hacked NT/2K box"
- Next in thread: H C: "RE: Hacked NT/2K box"
- Next in thread: H C: "RE: Hacked NT/2K box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Thor@HammerofGod.com To: focus-ms@securityfocus.com Message-ID: <027401c113ca$86046100$af05a8c0@anchorsign.com> Subject: Re: Hacked NT/2K box Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:54:48 -0700
> Also, with XP being released, there would be no reason to say that a
> hacker wouldn't be able to use an XP box for DDoS attacks. Because
> XP will have RAW Sockets, instead of the conventional NT-based W32
> Sockets. But, this wouldn't be an issue if system Admins kept up to
> date with security bulletins and also having a reliable firewall in
> place. Also a good security policy would only help against attacks
> internally.
>
There is already no reason to say that a hacker wouldn't be able to use
_any_ Win box for DDos.
Raw sockets in XP has absolutely nothing to do with it (Win2k already
supports this, btw.)
If I can run code on the box, then _nothing_ beyond that point matters,
regardless of whether the OS API directly supports raw sockets or not.
---------------------------------
Attonbitus Deus
Thor@HammerofGod.Com
- Previous message: Ben Greenbaum: "SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #44"
- In reply to: Chris Lynch, MCSE CCNAv2: "RE: Hacked NT/2K box"
- Next in thread: H C: "RE: Hacked NT/2K box"
- Next in thread: H C: "RE: Hacked NT/2K box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|