Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- From: fabio <ctrlaltca@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:45:20 +0100
The idea is simple and good, but there's a problem in its
implementation: usually modern systems doesn't compare the password you
write with the saved password; instead, they compare an hash of your
password attempt with the saved hash of your current password. By
design, two similar string have strongly different hashes. So you can't
compare two hashes and say if they correspond to two similar words.
Greets,
Fabio
Sebastiaan Veenstra wrote:
Hi,
I didn't read the whole discussion about this issue but I came up with
an idea which might be usefull to detect brute force attempt. By
storing the passwords a certain user has used in the past along with
the current password you could be able to compare to password (by
pattern matching) used at the login attempts with the passwords list.
If the password used differs significantly (this excludes typos) from
the entries in the password list, there could be a possible brute
force attempt. The reason for storing the previous passwords is that
people tend to use every password they've used in the past when they
forgot their password. Maybe this idea can be used along with the
other methods of detecting brute force attempts. Anyway, it's just a
random thought.
Greets,
Sebastiaan
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- From: Greg Metcalfe
- Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- From: Christian Jonassen
- Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- References:
- Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- From: Sebastiaan Veenstra
- Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- Prev by Date: Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- Next by Date: Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- Previous by thread: Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- Next by thread: Re: Detecting Brute-Force and Dictionary attacks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|