Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux
- From: Marco Monicelli <marco.monicelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:42:45 +0100
Not really, totally correct.
If you go to Google and type "Linux+worm", you'll see that an AV for Linux
is not a bad idea nowdays and that you weren't enough informed when you
wrote this reply.
Some example:
Linux.Slapper.Worm
Linux/Lupper.worm.a
Linux.Ramen.Worm
http://news.com.com/New+worm+targets+Linux+systems/2100-7349_3-5938475.html
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/07/linux_worm/
and I could go on with quoting you links like those....
Moreover, think about the thousands backdoors/trojan for linux that are in
the wild. Think about the famous rootkits which are still around. Maybe an
AV is not the best choice for a Linux system but Snort, tripwire, ethereal
are definitively helpful in keeping your penguin safe.
Cheers
Marco
aka Yog-Sotho
Alexander Klimov
<alserkli@xxxxxxx
u> To
focus-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
18/01/2006 14.01 cc
Subject
Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Benson, Sean M wrote:
> Should you run an anti-virus on linux for non-work issues?
> (Just home Workstations, Laptops, etc.. not mail servers.)
Just answer the following question: have you ever seen a virus which
has infected your linux box? If the answer is no (and I guess this is
the case) then it is pointless to install an anti-virus for internal
use.
--
Regards,
ASK
- References:
- Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux
- From: Alexander Klimov
- Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux // Re: MDKSA-2006:016
- Next by Date: Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux
- Next by thread: Re: Begs a question: AV in Linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|