RE: Samba vs NFS
From: Aditya Deshmukh (aditya.deshmukh_at_online.gateway.expertworks.net)
Date: 02/26/05
- Previous message: Gregory D. Rosenberg: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Maybe in reply to: Gregory D. Rosenberg: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'Jacob Bresciani'" <jacob@bresciani.ca>, <focus-linux@securityfocus.com> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:46:47 +0530
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jacob Bresciani [mailto:jacob@bresciani.ca]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:19 AM
>To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com
>Subject: Re: Samba vs NFS
>
>SMB shares can be made to remount on boot by adding a line to fstab the
>in a similar to adding lines for nfs shares to make them survive a
>reboot.
>
Nfs works across the server reboots - samba does not... My main server is
nfs for this reason
- Previous message: Gregory D. Rosenberg: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Maybe in reply to: Gregory D. Rosenberg: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|