RE: Samba vs NFS
From: Scott Fagg (scott.fagg_at_arup.com.au)
Date: 02/23/05
- Previous message: Edward J. Weinberg: "Re: Samba vs NFS"
- Maybe in reply to: Jennifer Fountain: "Samba vs NFS"
- Next in thread: Gregory D. Rosenberg: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:51:18 +1000 To: "Gregory D. Rosenberg" <gregg@ricis.com>, "Raul Dias" <chaos@swi.com.br>, "Avery Payne" <apayne@pcfruit.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregory D. Rosenberg [mailto:gregg@ricis.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 24 February 2005 2:04 AM
> To: Raul Dias; Avery Payne
> Cc: focus-linux@securityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: Samba vs NFS
>
> I can't speak to the technical details quite yet, but Novell
> / SUSE LINUX
> NSS offers substantial granularity and access controls, as well as
> significant data center scalability advantages. Netware users
> have long
> loved the security and access control features of NSS. Of
> course the fat
> lady hasn't sung quite yet. As the first production release
> is said to ship
> on March 1st. Although our limited experience during the
> BETAs so far was
> quite positive. What are folks thoughts. Has anyone given NSS
> a serious look?
In my netware days, NSS was just volume management. Is it now being used
to described networked filesystems ?
>
> At 2/22/2005 04:57 PM, Raul Dias wrote:
> >On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 17:07 -0800, Avery Payne wrote:
> >
> >> NFS is becoming "l
- Previous message: Edward J. Weinberg: "Re: Samba vs NFS"
- Maybe in reply to: Jennifer Fountain: "Samba vs NFS"
- Next in thread: Gregory D. Rosenberg: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]