Re: Samba vs NFS
From: Gustavo A. Lozano (glozano_at_noldata.com)
Date: 02/22/05
- Previous message: James Ko: "Re: Samba vs NFS"
- In reply to: Jennifer Fountain: "Samba vs NFS"
- Next in thread: Randall M Gunning: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Reply: Randall M Gunning: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Jennifer Fountain <jfountain@rbinc.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:53:25 -0500
NFS from Windows workstations? Probably it will be harder to implement
and you will need 3rd party software such as Reflection or AccessNFS
SMB is a good implementation, and can depend 100% on your Windows Domain
Controller if is the case, or you can even build your Domain from a
linux box.
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 17:42 -0500, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
> Hi all:
> My company is looking at samba or NFS to allow our clients to access
> shares from their Windows workstations and their linux ssh sessions.
> >From a security standpoint, which option is "more" secure? Which option
> is more vulnerable than the other? Etc, etc ,etc. I appeciate any
> security information about NFS or samba that you may have.
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Jennifer Fountain
> Systems Administrator
> R&B Distribution
> 3400 E Walnut Street
> Colmar, PA 18915
>
-- ======================== ===================== Gustavo A. Lozano Carrera 11A No. 90-16 Chief Technology Officer Oficina 205 Noldata Bogota D.C. http://noldata.com Colombia
- Previous message: James Ko: "Re: Samba vs NFS"
- In reply to: Jennifer Fountain: "Samba vs NFS"
- Next in thread: Randall M Gunning: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Reply: Randall M Gunning: "RE: Samba vs NFS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|