RE: Secure Form Script?
From: Paolo Campanella (paolo_at_mighty.co.za)
Date: 05/20/04
- Previous message: Dalibor Straka: "Re: iptables firewall script for debian-woody, 2.4.24"
- In reply to: Beth Skwarecki: "RE: Secure Form Script?"
- Next in thread: Tim Greer: "RE: Secure Form Script?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Beth Skwarecki <beth@cz-na.com> Date: 20 May 2004 10:04:54 +0200
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 18:36, Beth Skwarecki wrote:
> 2) HOWEVER, it's silly to be using sendmail at all, in most cases. This
> is what the perl module Mail::Sendmail is for. You give it a hash with
However, using the command line route has the advantage that, if your
sendmail is not running, your mail will still be accepted.
Also, IIRC, the command line is faster, and it should also be more
efficient, not needing to open sockets.
Of course Mail::Sendmail is the better recommendation for most people.
Bye
Paolo
- Previous message: Dalibor Straka: "Re: iptables firewall script for debian-woody, 2.4.24"
- In reply to: Beth Skwarecki: "RE: Secure Form Script?"
- Next in thread: Tim Greer: "RE: Secure Form Script?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|