RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risk s
From: Peter Mueller (pmueller_at_sidestep.com)
Date: 05/06/04
- Previous message: Victor Daniel a.k.a the MacNut: "Secure Form Script?"
- Next in thread: Kiran Maraju: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risk s"
- Reply: Kiran Maraju: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risk s"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "'nokernel@nokernel.com'" <nokernel@nokernel.com>, Kevin Barr <kevin@preventhacking.com> Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 13:12:36 -0700
> This is a very neat example! And I was currently looking for such a
> solution, since I have 2 isp but now im only using one of them. Now I
> will try to implement that! I was searching for this solution since I
> had a service failiure and I cannot aford such failiure again!
For all of you that are going to be doing this iproute2 setup, it is
important to read that footnote at the bottom!!
" Furthermore, if you really want to do this, you probably also want to look
at Julian Anastasov's patches at http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes , Julian's
route patch page. They will make things nicer to work with."
Without that kernel patch it's not a solution that will fix itself
automagically! So patch your kernel with Julian's code and forget your
worries :)
> Kevin Barr wrote:
>
> >Iproute2 sounds like the way to go. Here is a good tutorial
> on setting
> >up a linux router for 2 ISPs:
> >http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN258
> >
> >Kevin
Cheers,
P
- Previous message: Victor Daniel a.k.a the MacNut: "Secure Form Script?"
- Next in thread: Kiran Maraju: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risk s"
- Reply: Kiran Maraju: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risk s"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
