Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks
From: Cedric Blancher (blancher_at_cartel-securite.fr)
Date: 04/20/04
- Previous message: Drew Wymore: "Re: Issue with Ldap group and too many users"
- In reply to: Ravi: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Next in thread: Kevin Barr: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Ravi <ravivsn@roc.co.in> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 07:06:08 +0200
Le sam 17/04/2004 à 06:46, Ravi a écrit :
> -vrrpd if using two gateways
VRRP is a failover protocol. I don't see how you can achieve load
balancing with.
-- http://www.netexit.com/~sid/ PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE >> Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus. >> Copy me to your signature file and help me spread!
- Previous message: Drew Wymore: "Re: Issue with Ldap group and too many users"
- In reply to: Ravi: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Next in thread: Kevin Barr: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
