decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks
From: P. Deelman (p.deelman_at_hccnet.nl)
Date: 04/16/04
- Previous message: Glynn Clements: "Re: Re[2]: chroot & mount --bind = security ?"
- Next in thread: Glen Dosey: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Reply: Glen Dosey: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Maybe reply: Bryce Porter: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Reply: Kent Ritchie: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Reply: Ravi: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Maybe reply: Kevin Barr: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 21:18:18 +0200 To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com
Due to a little mistake i now have 2 broadband connections at home and
somehow i want to balance them (2mbit + 1 mbit). I wondered what the
most efficient way of doing this is and with possible security risks
involved.
At the moment i have a nice setup with a statefull designed iptables
firewall and i want to keep it that way. I've googled some and i found
some vague tools for windows that i really don't trust (well the entire
windows part, but that's something else) and a router that has 2 wan
connectors that claims that can do it. Since i also have wlan at home in
a wlan-dmz at my gateway i just want to insert a 4th nic into my box and
do some configging.
My current setup includes:
debian 3.0 stable 2.4.26 kernel
3 networks: wlan, internal, external
statefull iptables-script
my future setup needs to include just an extra network namely external2
:) without too many implications such as running a proxy with patches
which should be the last option to consider since my gateway isn't all
that fast :)
Any help welcome,
Regards,
P.Deelman
- Previous message: Glynn Clements: "Re: Re[2]: chroot & mount --bind = security ?"
- Next in thread: Glen Dosey: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Reply: Glen Dosey: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Maybe reply: Bryce Porter: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Reply: Kent Ritchie: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Reply: Ravi: "Re: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Maybe reply: Kevin Barr: "RE: decent loadbalancing with 2 different ISP's with minimum risks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|