Re: Password Questions

From: Systems Administrator (sysadmin_at_sunet.com.au)
Date: 12/05/03

  • Next message: circut_at_hackthisbox.org: "Re: Password Questions"
    Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:15:20 +1100 (EST)
    To: Brian Hatch <bri@ifokr.org>
    
    

    On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Brian Hatch wrote:

    > NIS, previously YP, is a bad idea because it's cleartext on the network
    > and the crypted passwords are visible to all local users. If you can't

            ..or you could do what I did. I was running RADIUS on the auth
    machine for other reasons, and so I shared our passwd, group, etc, but NOT
    shadow via NIS. Then I set up NIS, but set PAM to use RADIUS for auth.
    That way (since I needed RADIUS anyway), I was only sharing the passwords
    out with one mechanism.

    > get LDAP working, then I'd suggest for security reasons you scp the
    > /etc/shadow /etc/passwd and /etc/group files around instead. Just make

            Or, you could use cfengine :). But cfengine should only be used
    if you expect to add more machines in the future -- otherwise it's
    overkill.

            :)

    -- 
    Tim Nelson
    Systems Administrator
    Sunet Internet
    Tel: +61 3 5241 1155
    Fax: +61 3 5241 6187
    Web: http://www.sunet.com.au/
    Email: sysadmin@sunet.com.au
    

  • Next message: circut_at_hackthisbox.org: "Re: Password Questions"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: unified authentication
      ... >> inject his own packets which can have crypted passwords that he knows. ... > Which is why I use NIS with Kerberos - the passwords aren't in the NIS ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: pam and other authentication methods
      ... > passwd file and NIS). ... if you feel okay about letting crypted passwords fly ...
      (Debian-User)