Re: NFS replacements for Linux

From: Patrick Morris (pmorris_at_wilshire.com)
Date: 10/24/03

  • Next message: Dan Pritts: "Re: NFS replacements for Linux" 
    Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:03:59 -0700
To: Rohit <exploits@engr.uconn.edu>

    Rohit wrote:

    >We are going to be deploying Linux in computer labs with network shared
    >home directories. NFSv3 is widely supported and easy to set up, but truly lacks
    >security features we need.
    >
    >
    What security features do you need that NFS doesn't provide? That'd
    help narrow things down a bit.

    This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments.

    In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.

  • Next message: Dan Pritts: "Re: NFS replacements for Linux"