Re: more on linux hardening
From: Andrew Griffiths (andrewg_at_d2.net.au)
Date: 05/28/03
- Previous message: mark.securityfocus_at_winksmith.com: "Re: process accounting"
- In reply to: Mike Lockhart: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Next in thread: bmanning_at_karoshi.com: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:52:11 +1000 To: Mike Lockhart <backpacker@hikers.net>
Mike Lockhart wrote:
> Well, currently my systems implement quite a bit of lockdowns, from
> kernel security patches outside of the distro tree to firewalls and so
> forth. And even though I know these boxen are locked down about as
> tight as you can get, I'd like to find some way to build up a box that
> is completely trusted. Just not really sure where to start at. :)
Heh. One of the things about trusted systems, is they may be trusted,
but by whom?
>
> - Mike Lockhart
>
-- Attention: Public floggings will continue until morale improves. MidWay_/#melb-wireless licks txrxafk while his defenses are down. <MidWay_> Oh boy. That could have been taken out of context.
- Previous message: mark.securityfocus_at_winksmith.com: "Re: process accounting"
- In reply to: Mike Lockhart: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Next in thread: bmanning_at_karoshi.com: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
