Re: more on linux hardening
From: Mike Lockhart (backpacker_at_hikers.net)
Date: 05/27/03
- Previous message: Anders Gustafsson: "Re: process accounting"
- In reply to: Mike Lockhart: "more on linux hardening"
- Next in thread: Andrew Griffiths: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: Andrew Griffiths: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: bmanning_at_karoshi.com: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com Date: 27 May 2003 16:12:09 -0400
Well, currently my systems implement quite a bit of lockdowns, from
kernel security patches outside of the distro tree to firewalls and so
forth. And even though I know these boxen are locked down about as
tight as you can get, I'd like to find some way to build up a box that
is completely trusted. Just not really sure where to start at. :)
- Mike Lockhart
-- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GCS/IT/E d- s++:++ a-- C++ UBLS++++$ P++> L+++$> !E W+++@ N++@ !o K-- w-- O M+@ V PS+ PE- Y++> PGP++ t 5 X+ R@ tv b+++> DI++ D+ G++@ e++> h@ r+@ x++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- Previous message: Anders Gustafsson: "Re: process accounting"
- In reply to: Mike Lockhart: "more on linux hardening"
- Next in thread: Andrew Griffiths: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: Andrew Griffiths: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: bmanning_at_karoshi.com: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|