more on linux hardening
From: Mike Lockhart (backpacker_at_hikers.net)
Date: 05/27/03
- Previous message: Craig Holmes: "Re: process accounting"
- Next in thread: Mike Lockhart: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: Mike Lockhart: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: Seth Arnold: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: De Velopment: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Maybe reply: Axel de Kimpe: "RE: more on linux hardening"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com Date: 26 May 2003 18:17:00 -0400
Are there any good quality papers on creating a system from scratch (not
LFS though) that can be trusted 100%? To further elaborate on what I
mean, I'd like to find a way to build from source a trusted system that
is running only binaries/libs that are built from a trusted compiler,
etc.
- Mike Lockhart
Systems/Network Administrator
AP Servers
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS/IT/E d- s++:++ a-- C++ UBLS++++$ P++> L+++$> !E W+++@ N++@ !o K--
w-- O M+@ V PS+ PE- Y++> PGP++ t 5 X+ R@ tv b+++> DI++ D+ G++@ e++> h@
r+@ x++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- Previous message: Craig Holmes: "Re: process accounting"
- Next in thread: Mike Lockhart: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: Mike Lockhart: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: Seth Arnold: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Reply: De Velopment: "Re: more on linux hardening"
- Maybe reply: Axel de Kimpe: "RE: more on linux hardening"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
