Re: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?

From: Jason Kohles (jkohles@redhat.com)
Date: 04/10/03

  • Next message: Chapman, Justin T: "RE: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?" 
    Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:56:49 -0400
From: Jason Kohles <jkohles@redhat.com>
To: Gushterul <emild@sinaia.globtel.ro>

    On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 06:42:54PM +0300, Gushterul wrote:
    > So this means all redhat 7.3 users(wich I guess are a lot upgraded from
    > previous buggy versions), we must change our machines to fit the redhat 9
    > requirements, no? Here goes the planet... here goes the open source
    > and stable systems dream... Seems that fight for "compatible with last
    > tech" affect usual people more and more. They take probably 10 bugs out
    > and put more at each release like I said to Alan Cox. Can you please stop
    > somewhere and build a stable linux/kernel for all existing tech at that
    > moment, and keep it stable and fix the things without put "new features
    > for new tech"? Thanks! :)
    >
    If you want long release cycles and don't care about new technology added
    as quickly, that is what Red Hat Enterprise Linux is all about...

    http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/ 

    -- 
Jason Kohles                                 jkohles@redhat.com
Senior Engineer                 Red Hat Professional Consulting
  • Next message: Chapman, Justin T: "RE: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"