Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?
From: Mat Price (mprice@avici.com)
Date: 04/02/03
- Previous message: terry white: "Re: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Next in thread: John Jasen: "Re: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Reply: John Jasen: "Re: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Reply: Augis: "Re: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Maybe reply: Chapman, Justin T: "RE: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 20:44:19 -0500 From: Mat Price <mprice@avici.com> To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com
What I have done in the past is make a directory on a ftp server with
all update rpms except the kernel rpms. Then I ran a script on the
clients that would check the version of redhat it was running on, then
download the correct rpms. Once they where on the machine it did a rpm
-Fvh *.rpm. This Freshen's/upgrades only the rpms you have installed.
Then the the script would clean up after it's self. I didn't do the
kernel since it always went badly. If I needed the kernel upgrade I
would do it by hand and do a rpm -ivh <rpmfile> then edit grub.conf to
point to the new kernal as the default. If you have only a few machine
writing the script may be over kill. I wish I still had it but the
project got lost a while back. The other thing you could do is mount it
over nfs if the clients have small drives or use sftp if you want to do
it in a secure way.
mat
- Previous message: terry white: "Re: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Next in thread: John Jasen: "Re: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Reply: John Jasen: "Re: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Reply: Augis: "Re: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Maybe reply: Chapman, Justin T: "RE: Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|