Re: Live Upgrade for Linux
From: Daniel Wittenberg (daniel-wittenberg@uiowa.edu)
Date: 04/02/03
- Previous message: Andy Wild: "Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- In reply to: J C Lawrence: "Re: Live Upgrade for Linux"
- Next in thread: Seth Arnold: "Re: Live Upgrade for Linux"
- Reply: Seth Arnold: "Re: Live Upgrade for Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Daniel Wittenberg <daniel-wittenberg@uiowa.edu> To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com Date: 01 Apr 2003 16:32:11 -0600
On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 23:29, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:33:04 -0600
> Dan Freed <dfreed@epicsystems.com> wrote:
>
> > What about apt-get for rpms?
>
> RPM doesn't encode sufficient dependency data to support the sort of
> automatic dependency and conflict resolution that make Debian so
> attractive, and arguably a pkg mgmt system should have
But apt-get (or apt-rpm) works great with RPM. There are things I like
about rpm and about apt, so with apt-rpm you get the best of both
worlds.
Dan
- Previous message: Andy Wild: "Red Hat: To patch or to upgrade?"
- In reply to: J C Lawrence: "Re: Live Upgrade for Linux"
- Next in thread: Seth Arnold: "Re: Live Upgrade for Linux"
- Reply: Seth Arnold: "Re: Live Upgrade for Linux"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|