Re: Port 113 security
From: Peter H. Lemieux (phl@cyways.com)
Date: 03/10/03
- Previous message: Brian Hatch: "Re: Port 113 security"
- Maybe in reply to: Chris Santerre: "Port 113 security"
- Next in thread: Björn Eriksson: "Re: Port 113 security"
- Reply: Björn Eriksson: "Re: Port 113 security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:17:53 -0500 From: "Peter H. Lemieux" <phl@cyways.com> To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com
I use fakeidentd to send a standardized reply to all requests:
A few years ago I found that some flavors of Unix (specifically some HP-UX
versions) wouldn't exchange mail with a server that did not respond to an
ident request. I came across fakeidentd in my search for a solution.
Works like a charm.
Chris Santerre wrote:
> Currently I block port 113 (ident) on the firewall.
> ... does everyone generally let these thru?
- Previous message: Brian Hatch: "Re: Port 113 security"
- Maybe in reply to: Chris Santerre: "Port 113 security"
- Next in thread: Björn Eriksson: "Re: Port 113 security"
- Reply: Björn Eriksson: "Re: Port 113 security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|