Re: User?s and Shells
From: Philipp Schulte (pschulte@uni-duisburg.de)
Date: 12/19/02
- Previous message: Brian Hatch: "Re: User?s and Shells"
- In reply to: OTERO Hernan Gustavo EDS: "Userīs and Shells"
- Next in thread: Golden_Eternity: "RE: User?s and Shells"
- Reply: Golden_Eternity: "RE: User?s and Shells"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:04:06 +0100 From: Philipp Schulte <pschulte@uni-duisburg.de> To: "'focus-linux@securityfocus.com'" <focus-linux@securityfocus.com>
OTERO Hernan Gustavo EDS wrote:
> Looking in the /etc/passwd in my RH 8.0 instalation, the users
>
> news:x:9:13:news:/etc/news:
> rpm:x:37:37::/var/lib/rpm:/bin/bash
>
> has shell. Why this users need shell?
I don't know why RH does this. But having a valid shell in /etc/passwd
is not sufficent for an attacker. The account also must have a valid
password in /etc/shadow (or wherever your OS keeps them). Usually the
role-accounts look somewhat like this:
bin:*:9797:0:::::
ftp:*:9797:0:::::
daemon:*:9797:0:::::
adm:*:9797:0:::::
The "*" or some other symbol like "!" means, that this is not a valid
password and so nobody can enter a correct password for this account.
Phil
- Next message: Christian Hammers: "Re: User?s and Shells"
- Previous message: Brian Hatch: "Re: User?s and Shells"
- In reply to: OTERO Hernan Gustavo EDS: "Userīs and Shells"
- Next in thread: Golden_Eternity: "RE: User?s and Shells"
- Reply: Golden_Eternity: "RE: User?s and Shells"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|