Re: securing nic's for snort
From: quentyn@fotango.comDate: 05/30/02
- Previous message: Burak DAYIOGLU: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- In reply to: Patrick Morris: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Next in thread: Patrick Morris: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Reply: Patrick Morris: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:19:41 +0100 From: quentyn@fotango.com To: Patrick Morris <pmorris@wilshire.com>
Patrick Morris wrote:
>
> You've pretty much got two options on this. You can have a stealth
> interface (which just means you've got no IP address assigned to it, so
> it listens on the network but there's no address to hit it on), or
> you can go all out and attach it to your hub/switch with a
> listen-only cable (one with the transmit wires removed).
fairly certain that a listen only cable will not work with a switch....
why not use an ether tap ?
there is no substitute for a hardware based solution :o)
Q
-- ##################### Quentyn Taylor Sysadmin - Fotango ##################### "Now, it is indeed possible that you are imparting great wisdom while looking like a semi-literate half wit, but I and many others like me will never see that wisdom if we blow by you on our way through 300+ messages a day." Ben Ryan
- Previous message: Burak DAYIOGLU: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- In reply to: Patrick Morris: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Next in thread: Patrick Morris: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Reply: Patrick Morris: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|