Re: securing nic's for snort
From: Burak DAYIOGLU (dayioglu@metu.edu.tr)Date: 05/29/02
- Previous message: Stephen Samuel: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- In reply to: Patrick Morris: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Next in thread: quentyn@fotango.com: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 09:45:17 +0300 From: Burak DAYIOGLU <dayioglu@metu.edu.tr> To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com
Patrick Morris wrote:
>You've pretty much got two options on this. You can have a stealth
>interface (which just means you've got no IP address assigned to it, so
>it listens on the network but there's no address to hit it on), or
>you can go all out and attach it to your hub/switch with a
>listen-only cable (one with the transmit wires removed).
>
>
Better yet, you can merge this two "options". Use a receive-only cable
(search focus-ids archives
for extensive discussions on this) and do not attach an IP address to
that interface.
regards.
-- Burak DAYIOGLU Phone: +90 312 2103379 Fax: +90 312 2103333 http://www.dayioglu.net ICQ UIN: 72276975
- Previous message: Stephen Samuel: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- In reply to: Patrick Morris: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Next in thread: quentyn@fotango.com: "Re: securing nic's for snort"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|