Re: Pam access.conf and host access
From: Shane Hickey (shane@howsyournetwork.com)Date: 02/20/02
- Previous message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: RPM aware rootkits?"
- In reply to: Shane Hickey: "Pam access.conf and host access"
- Next in thread: Ajai Khattri: "Re: Pam access.conf and host access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Shane Hickey <shane@howsyournetwork.com> To: Shane Hickey <shane@howsyournetwork.com> Date: 19 Feb 2002 17:22:34 -0700
Ack... It was just a matter of a missing trailimg dot. I incorrectly
thought that the last "." was only used as a sort of wildcard.
So, it should have been
-:ALL:ALL EXCEPT LOCAL 10.10.0.1.
Thanks to all who responded. Not one person called me an idiot, even
though I prolly deserved it.
Thanks,
shane
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 10:22, Shane Hickey wrote:
> Hmm.. I'm seeing something weird with the pam-0.75-19 RedHat rpm. I'm
> restricting ssh access to a box using the following for my
> /etc/security/access.conf
>
> -:ALL:ALL EXCEPT LOCAL 10.10.0.1
>
> When I try to ssh in from that IP, I get the following in the logs.
>
> Feb 19 10:04:11 test1 sshd[1774]: PAM rejected by account
> configuration[6]: Permission denied
> Feb 19 10:04:11 test1 sshd[1774]: Failed password for ROOT from
> 10.10.0.1 port 34741 ssh2
>
> However, if I change my access.conf to look like this..
>
> -ALL:ALL EXCEPT LOCAL 10.10.0.
>
> I can log in fine. It's almost like there is a weird bug or something
> that is failing to match a single complete IP in access.conf?
>
> Has anyone else seen this, or am I crazy (or doing something wrong)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shane Hickey
>
-- Shane Hickey Network/System Consultant Howsyournetwork.com 406.240.6675
- Previous message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: RPM aware rootkits?"
- In reply to: Shane Hickey: "Pam access.conf and host access"
- Next in thread: Ajai Khattri: "Re: Pam access.conf and host access"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|