Re: apache and nimda (now iptables)
From: Christophe Zwecker (doc@zwecker.de)Date: 02/07/02
- Previous message: Hal Flynn: "Nimda Thread == Dead Horse"
- In reply to: Wojtek Sobola: "Re: apache and nimda (now iptables)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Christophe Zwecker <doc@zwecker.de> To: Wojtek Sobola <Wojciech.Sobola@snt.pl> Date: 07 Feb 2002 20:52:58 +0100
On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 00:46, Wojtek Sobola wrote:
> Remember Gentelmans :] that this is not the correct way of filtering Nimda
> because connections stay broken this way if You use --string.
how about using hogwash ? isnt that better ?
Christophe
-- Christophe Zwecker mail: doc@zwecker.de Hamburg, Germany fon: +49 179 3994867 http://www.zwecker.de"Who is General Failure ? And why is he reading my disk ??"
- Previous message: Hal Flynn: "Nimda Thread == Dead Horse"
- In reply to: Wojtek Sobola: "Re: apache and nimda (now iptables)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]