Re: Encryption
From: Seth Arnold (sarnold@wirex.com)Date: 01/17/02
- Previous message: Charles Clancy: "Re: PAM and LinuxRouter questions"
- In reply to: Burak DAYIOGLU: "Re: Encryption"
- Next in thread: Eric Grejda: "Re: Encryption"
- Next in thread: Kurt Seifried: "Re: Encryption"
- Reply: Eric Grejda: "Re: Encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 10:42:25 -0800 From: Seth Arnold <sarnold@wirex.com> To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 03:35:12PM +0200, Burak DAYIOGLU wrote:
> ITU-T X.509 is a certificate standard and it is not a certificate
> repository standard. So, I didn't understand how PGP is able to use
> X.509? It may be correct that PGP uses LDAP repositories for
> storage/retrieval but X.509 integration is an unknown for me.
Contained within the x.509 certs, or the pgp key packets, is simply some
very large numbers. Those large numbers are used for RSA or El Gamal
public key crypto. PGP 2.x came with RSA support initially; I don't
recall when PGP moved to (patent-unencumbered) El Gamal, but it is
likely PGP supports both RSA and El Gamal just fine these days.
The same goes for GnuPG; it supports (patent-unencumbered) El Gamal, but
has stubs to allow for back-wards compatibility with RSA.
It isn't a real huge leap for PGP to deal with both X.509 certs and PGP
key packets.
Cheers! :)
-- Find out why the United States jailed a Russian citizen over a lecture: http://www.anti-dmca.com/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Charles Clancy: "Re: PAM and LinuxRouter questions"
- In reply to: Burak DAYIOGLU: "Re: Encryption"
- Next in thread: Eric Grejda: "Re: Encryption"
- Next in thread: Kurt Seifried: "Re: Encryption"
- Reply: Eric Grejda: "Re: Encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|