Re: Encryption
From: Thilo Bangert (thilo.bangert@gmx.net)Date: 01/15/02
- Previous message: Jose Nazario: "Re: Encryption"
- In reply to: Tom Arseneault: "Re: Encryption"
- Next in thread: Burak DAYIOGLU: "Re: Encryption"
- Next in thread: Kurt Seifried: "Re: Encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Thilo Bangert <thilo.bangert@gmx.net> To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:54:23 +0100
On Monday, 14. January 2002 22:59, you wrote:
> I have been doing some experiments between PGP and GPG and as far as
> I can tell messages can be transfered easily between the two systems
> (current versions at least). The only major difference I found
> between to two systesms is that PGP seems to have a more fleshed out
> key sharing system. PGP seems to be able to use x.509 (ldap) systems
> as well as HTP, email and FTP key server while GPG does not
> understand x.509. From a note I found on the GPG site (paraphrased,
> as I can't recall the exact wording) "...GPG and x.509 are competing
> standards..." so I would not expect it to support x.509 anytime in
> the near furture.
>
actually: Cebit 2002
funded by the german government!
<quote>
Rough list of aims:
- Plug-In for KMail and Mutt
- LDAP support for Certificate Revocation Lists, CRLs
- incorporation of sphinx protocols in gpg framework
- X.509, PKCS11, PKCS12 and PKCS15 support
- parallel support of OpenPGP
- LDAP support for KMail address book
- All finished for CeBIT 2002, Hannover
</quote>
have a look at
http://www.gnupg.org/aegypten/
greetings
Thilo
- Previous message: Jose Nazario: "Re: Encryption"
- In reply to: Tom Arseneault: "Re: Encryption"
- Next in thread: Burak DAYIOGLU: "Re: Encryption"
- Next in thread: Kurt Seifried: "Re: Encryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|