About named port binding
From: chulmin (chulmin@etc.co.kr)Date: 01/03/02
- Previous message: Paul Lussier: "Re: Locking Down a Linux Box"
- Next in thread: Wojtek Pawlikowski: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Wojtek Pawlikowski: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Andreas Gietl: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Seth Arnold: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Blazej Kantak: "Re: About named port binding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "chulmin" <chulmin@etc.co.kr> To: <focus-linux@lists.securityfocus.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:55:31 +0900
Hello, all.
I know that only root account bind a port below 1024.
and anyuser except root can bind or use a port above 1024.
But named process uses udp port 53 with named uid.
How can it be possible?
and is it illegal or exception?
Thanks in advance.
- Previous message: Paul Lussier: "Re: Locking Down a Linux Box"
- Next in thread: Wojtek Pawlikowski: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Wojtek Pawlikowski: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Andreas Gietl: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Seth Arnold: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: About named port binding"
- Reply: Blazej Kantak: "Re: About named port binding"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|