Re: Strange Traffic..
From: John Sage (jsage@finchhaven.com)Date: 11/30/01
- Previous message: Jeffrey Denton: "Re: secure remote logging"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Message-ID: <3C07189A.4050807@finchhaven.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 21:26:50 -0800 From: John Sage <jsage@finchhaven.com> To: Vinay Kudithipudi <kudithipudi@mail.ru> Subject: Re: Strange Traffic..
Vinay:
I think this looks like nameserver-to-nameserver dns traffic, see
comments in line..
Vinay Kudithipudi wrote:
> Hello Guys,
> Our DNS servers have been getting a lot of strange traffic from
> a couple of IP addresses allocated to the Social Security
> Administration.
>
> Here is a tcpdump , I did one one of our DNS servers.
>
> 07:00:35.988875 199.173.224.20.domain > dns1.domain: 45115 (35)
199.x.x.x:53 sends 35 bytes to dns1:53 with a query number of 45115
> 07:00:35.989564 dns1.domain > 199.173.224.20.domain: 45115 0/2/1 (100) (DF)
dns1 answers query number 45115 with 100 bytes, zero answer records, 2
authoritative records, 1 additional records...
So, what ever it is they think they want, you apparently don't have the
specific IP address, but you may have the relevant nameserver, and
you've got some additional stuff, too...
Now, if it's the *volume* of traffic you're talking about, that's a
different kind of issue.
I'd try to get in touch with llsmith@ssa.gov and ask him "wassup?"
UUNET Technologies, Inc. (NETBLK-UUCBLK170-173)NETBLK-UUCBLK170-173
199.170.0.0 - 199.173.255.255
Social Security Administration (NETBLK-UU-199-173-224-D2)
UU-199-173-224-D2
199.173.224.0 - 199.173.231.255
Social Security Administration (NETBLK-UU-199-173-224-D2)
6401 Security Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21235
US Netname: UU-199-173-224-D2
Netblock: 199.173.224.0 - 199.173.231.255
Coordinator:
Smith, Lionel Lloyd (LS112-ARIN) llsmith@ssa.gov
(410) 965-8963 (FAX) (410) 965-4110
Record last updated on 08-Oct-1998.
Database last updated on 29-Nov-2001 19:56:47 EDT.
(I don't think it's necessarily unusual that the data for this specific
record hasn't changed since 1998..)
- John
<snip>
>
> The other IP's that we are getting this kind of traffic are
> 199.173.224.2 and 199.173.225.21.
>
> I did a portscan on these IP's using nmap and the only ports open on
> these boxes are SMTP and AUTH. Also the output says that the boxes
> have been up from 1985!!!
>
> This traffic is killing our servers. I am planning on blocking these
> IP's from our routers, but wanted to hear other opinions from this
> group. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
>
>
>
- Previous message: Jeffrey Denton: "Re: secure remote logging"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|