Apache-SSL or mod_ssl?
From: Casey Allen Shobe (cshobe@softhome.net)Date: 11/25/01
- Previous message: Raphael Quoilin: "Re: monitoring cpuload"
- Next in thread: Sami Dalouche: "RE: Apache-SSL or mod_ssl?"
- Reply: Sami Dalouche: "RE: Apache-SSL or mod_ssl?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Casey Allen Shobe <cshobe@softhome.net> To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com Subject: Apache-SSL or mod_ssl? Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 19:11:21 -0500 Message-ID: <courier.3C003533.00000386@softhome.net>
I've just setup Apache-SSL, which is basically a set of patches applied to
the apache source that builds httpsd instead when finished. The advantage
that I see is that there are two distinct binaries, configuration files, etc.
However I was curious if anybody could give me a good breakdown of
differences between Apache-SSL and mod_ssl for Apache from a security
standpoint. Are there any security advantages/drawbacks to using one over
the other?
Thanks for any advice,
-- Casey Allen Shobe cshobe@softhome.net GCS/CM d+ s+:->+: a-- C++(++++) ULU++++$ P- L+++>++++ E- W++ N++ !o K- w-- !O M V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP>++ t+ 5+ X R>+ tv-- b++ DI+ D---- G++ e h-(*) r--- z--
- Previous message: Raphael Quoilin: "Re: monitoring cpuload"
- Next in thread: Sami Dalouche: "RE: Apache-SSL or mod_ssl?"
- Reply: Sami Dalouche: "RE: Apache-SSL or mod_ssl?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]