Re: Limit the use of bandwich
From: Chris Ricker (kaboom@gatech.edu)Date: 10/19/01
- Previous message: dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com: "Re: Limit the use of bandwich"
- In reply to: Seth Arnold: "Re: Limit the use of bandwich"
- Next in thread: dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com: "Re: Limit the use of bandwich"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 08:14:14 -0600 (MDT) From: Chris Ricker <kaboom@gatech.edu> To: <focus-linux@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: Limit the use of bandwich Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110190809191.9440-100000@verdande.oobleck.net>
On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 01:01:31AM -0300, Alejandro Perretta wrote:
> > Wich are the best way to limit the use of bandwich. For example i
> > have a PAP of 2MB and i want give 64 KB to 192.168.0.1 to 192.168.0.50
> > and 19KB to 192.168.0.51 to 192.168.0.100. ..
>
> I've heard that Linux has some sort of 'iproute2' command/system that
> may allow this. Being more familiar with the ipf/pf systems in the BSDs,
> I'd be more inclined to use the KAME project's Quality of Service
> implementation.
On Linux, QoS is done using ip and tc. ip is the all-everything
route/interface/arp manipulator, tc is the traffic control engine. It's
extremely powerful and fairly straight-forward once you get used to it. In
my experience it performs better than KAME's QoS.
later,
chris
- Previous message: dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com: "Re: Limit the use of bandwich"
- In reply to: Seth Arnold: "Re: Limit the use of bandwich"
- Next in thread: dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com: "Re: Limit the use of bandwich"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|