Re: LPD: Summary, fury and more
From: Scott Gifford (sgifford@suspectclass.com)Date: 10/11/01
- Previous message: Seth Arnold: "Re: Login Control"
- Maybe in reply to: Sanjeev B.S.: "LPD: Summary, fury and more"
- Next in thread: Charles Clancy: "Re: LPD: Summary, fury and more"
- Next in thread: Jarno Huuskonen: "Re: LPD configuration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Sanjeev B.S." <sanjeev@mbu.iisc.ernet.in> Subject: Re: LPD: Summary, fury and more From: Scott Gifford <sgifford@suspectclass.com> Date: 11 Oct 2001 16:23:13 -0400 Message-ID: <lyd73uorim.fsf@gfn.org>
"Sanjeev B.S." <sanjeev@mbu.iisc.ernet.in> writes:
> I would like to summerise the responses I got for my earlier
> question regarding vulnerability of lpd(LPRng), which finally meant
> something like, 'Is it possible to make lpd accessible only from
> console of Redhat 7.1?'. Here the responses are:
Sorry for coming in late on this, but you might want to see if the
patch attached to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38850
helps. It lets you specify a single interface to listen on (such as
127.0.0.1), or have lpd not listen on a TCP socket at all, which lets
you just use it for printing without anybody else being able to
connect to it. I think this is what you want.
Good luck,
----ScottG.
- Previous message: Seth Arnold: "Re: Login Control"
- Maybe in reply to: Sanjeev B.S.: "LPD: Summary, fury and more"
- Next in thread: Charles Clancy: "Re: LPD: Summary, fury and more"
- Next in thread: Jarno Huuskonen: "Re: LPD configuration"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|