masqerading vs. application proxy
From: Waldemar Brodkorb (waldemar@thinknow.de)Date: 09/27/01
- Previous message: Dan Abend: "Re: Help with hijacked sendmail (RESOLVED)"
- Next in thread: Craig Holmes: "Re: masqerading vs. application proxy"
- Reply: Craig Holmes: "Re: masqerading vs. application proxy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 20:47:32 +0200 From: Waldemar Brodkorb <waldemar@thinknow.de> To: focus-linux@securityfocus.com Subject: masqerading vs. application proxy Message-ID: <20010927204731.G5527@thinknow.de>
Hello *,
I have a question about firewall's and security on linux.
Is there an advantage to use application proxy's instead of a
masqerading box to secure a LAN with private IP addresses from
the dangerous internet.
I don't mean danger from inside the LAN (which could be solved
through user authentication, IP-based ACL's ...).
When I have to allow users inside my network the use of IRC, ICQ,
RealAudio/RealVideo or FTP (with a real FTP client), is then an
application proxy more secure than masqerading?
Under application proxy's I understand the use of squid
(for http/ftp/https) or dante (for socks5 aware applications).
thanks for any comments.
bye
Waldemar
- Previous message: Dan Abend: "Re: Help with hijacked sendmail (RESOLVED)"
- Next in thread: Craig Holmes: "Re: masqerading vs. application proxy"
- Reply: Craig Holmes: "Re: masqerading vs. application proxy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]