A note about firewalls and ftp servers.
From: Rob 'Feztaa' Park (fezziker@home.com)Date: 09/27/01
- Previous message: John S. Jacob: "Re: Help with hijacked sendmail"
- Next in thread: Craig Holmes: "Re: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Reply: Craig Holmes: "Re: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Reply: Tommaso Di Donato: "Re: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Reply: Peter H. Lemieux: "Re: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Reply: Mark Boddington: "RE: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:38:29 -0600 (MDT) From: Rob 'Feztaa' Park <fezziker@home.com> To: Bugtraq - Focus Linux <focus-linux@securityfocus.com> Subject: A note about firewalls and ftp servers. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0109261634400.4166-100000@feztron.ath.cx>
I've noticed a few people asking about getting their firewalls to let ftp
connections work properly.
I'll now briefly detail my experiences with proftpd and iptables:
Symptom: users can connect to ftp server, but can't receive directory
listings or files.
Problem: iptables allows traffic through on port 21, but not 20.
Solution: Either set up iptables to accept traffic on port 20, or set up
connection tracking and allow iptables to accept related and established
connections.
-- Rob 'Feztaa' Park fezziker@home.com -- The IBM purchase of ROLM gives new meaning to the term "twisted pair". -- Howard Anderson, "Yankee Group"
- Previous message: John S. Jacob: "Re: Help with hijacked sendmail"
- Next in thread: Craig Holmes: "Re: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Reply: Craig Holmes: "Re: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Reply: Tommaso Di Donato: "Re: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Reply: Peter H. Lemieux: "Re: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Reply: Mark Boddington: "RE: A note about firewalls and ftp servers."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|