Security Patches to the Linux Kernel
From: twm139@its.toDate: 08/30/01
- Previous message: Antony Nguyen: "RE: Port 32768/tcp"
- In reply to: Hal Flynn: "DHCP Discussion"
- Next in thread: Michael J. Cannon: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Michael J. Cannon: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: twm139@its.to: "RE: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Jose Nazario: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Jonathan Rickman: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Fabrice MARIE: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Jason Englander: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:27:08 -0600 (MDT) From: <twm139@its.to> To: <focus-linux@securityfocus.com> Subject: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108292019400.14042-100000@arnold.its.to>
Has anyone here experimented with, or put into production any of the
patches, mods or improvements to Linux's default security architecture?
Two of the systems that I have been looking at are:
1) The NSA's SE Linux at http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/
2) GRSecurity from http://www.getrewted.net/
I have been playing with the GRSecurity patches a bit and they seem to add
a nice level of features to stock linux such as randomization of certain
sequence numbers (PIDS and Network), symlink improvements, as well as
features that make a chroot enviroment more secure. Unfortunately I have
been having problems with some dcache related bug with the patch and 2.4.9
and I have not been able to figure out if there is a mail list for this
patch yet to discuss bugs or issues.
I have not yet tried out the NSA patches, although they seem to have a
slightly different focus, or rather I suppose a much broader focus than
simply securing a few problem areas such as buffer overflows, symlink
problems, or chroot flaws.
I would be interested in learning what other peoples experiences with
these or other security policy patches have been.
Cheers,
Terrence
- Previous message: Antony Nguyen: "RE: Port 32768/tcp"
- In reply to: Hal Flynn: "DHCP Discussion"
- Next in thread: Michael J. Cannon: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Michael J. Cannon: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: twm139@its.to: "RE: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Jose Nazario: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Jonathan Rickman: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Fabrice MARIE: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Reply: Jason Englander: "Re: Security Patches to the Linux Kernel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|