Re: IPS/IDS behavior with ISIC/UDPSIC/TCPSIC/ICMPSIC traffic



Hi,

What do you mean by "attacks must be detected at much earlier stages
when creating a NETWORK"?
If you seem to indicate that it is responsibility of victim company to
get more bandwidth, then it would be still lot smaller than the
bandwidth botnets have or patriotic activists have (combined
ofcourse).

Ravi


On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Sanjay R <2sanjayr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi..i think the mail was not delivered to the group. so i m resending.
pardon for duplication to some.

-sanjay

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Sanjay R <2sanjayr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hi Ravi:
I am not aware of whether NSS has or not the DDOS attacks in its list,
but coming to your question, i would say that detecting/stopping DDOS
is not that straight forward. you can always set some filter based on
Rate of traffic (earlier i worked with Intoto IPS and it has this type
of filter). still there is a problem - different IPs are used (and
hence the name DDOS! ). if you go deeper, you will find that problem
does not lies (as far as IDS/IPS mis concerned) in detecting at DDOSed
victim's side (in your example CNN). there are other infected
computers that participated in DDOS. if you analyze CNN attack, you
will find that there was an infected web page that in turn lwas
loading CNN page (or some part of it). you can do this by crating a
hidden frame with img src (<img src="cnn.com/something/something">).
(very recently, it was termed as puppetnet also). if many people
(zombies) have this type of web pages and people are connecting to it,
CNN will be called again n again. This can also be done by XSS by
targeting a busy public forum. so, what i m trying to say is - such
attacks must be detected at much earlier stages when creating a
NETWORK.

regards
-Sanjay

--Computer Security Learner

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Ravi Chunduru
<ravi.is.chunduru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tcpsic program today is not completing three way handshake. What
about tools and attacks that complete three way handshake? recently
cnn.com was DDOSed by set of people in china during tibet unrest
time. This attack was not only completing three way handshake, but
also downloading content from a specific URL. My questions.

Why is this not considered in NSS testing criteria? Is it not
considered as an attack that need to be protected by IPS devices?

Ravi

On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Srinivasa Addepalli <srao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


ISIC generates many packets with different IP protocols. If you have
firewall, you can block the protocols which you don't require. Also, it
generates UDP, TCP packets with wrong checksum. Since IPS software drops the
packets with wrong checksum, this may not be the cause for either 100% CPU
utilization or running out of session entries.

TCPSIC: Since many IPS boxes have SYN flood protection, this also may not be
the reason for the problem you are facing.

UDPSIC: This can use up all resources. If you have connection rate limit
function, then utilize it to limit the rate. Typically, each session is kept
for inactivity timeout period. If number of new packets within this timeout
period exceed number of session entries the IPS box supports, then further
new connections are not entertained. If the connection rate limit is set to
less than <Number of session entries supported by IPS>/<inactivity timeout>,
then IPS session entries don't get exhausted.

If you still see 100% CPU problem, you may like to check you log settings.
If connection logging (for NBA) is enabled, then for every packet it might
be generating a log message and that might exhaust CPU.

Even though it is obvious, let me state it anyway :-). If the input packet
rate is more than the CPU (that is running IPS) can process, then you see
100% CPU problem.

Thanks
Srini


-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:listbounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Ravi Chunduru
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 8:22 AM
To: focus-ids@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: IPS/IDS behavior with ISIC/UDPSIC/TCPSIC/ICMPSIC traffic

According to NSS testing criteria, the IPS/IDS devices are expected
to work normally even during the time *SIC traffic is sent at
60000pkts/sec with each packet size of 690 bytes. I find that inline
snort IPS software based PC device stops passing any legitimate
traffic when this *SIC traffic is sent at very high speed. As such I
also see this problem even if UDPSIC traffic (with random ports) is
passed with 50000 pkts/sec. Once the traffic is stopped, it starts
working normally. Note that if I use UDPSIC with fixed port, then I
don't see the problem of 100% CPU utilization and other traffic passes
normally.

I am using PC with P4 processor running at 2.8Ghz.


Is there any significance to 60000 pkts/sec NSS number? Also, what is
the expected behavior of IPS software during this load?
Does NSS test with random UDP ports? Or do they use one fixed port
while running UDPSIC and TCPSIC?

Thanks
Ravi

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=in
tro_sfw
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


********************************************************************************
This email message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential, proprietary and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please immediately notify the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Thank you.

Intoto Inc.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------






--
Computer Security Learner


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Relevant Pages

  • Re: TippingPoint Releases Open Source Code for FirstIntrusionPrev ention Test Tool, Tomahawk
    ... For example, if the IPS drops packets, ... I think retransmitting the last "appropriate" packets would be ... It's also on the todo list for tcpreplay v3. ... scalable then running legit attacks. ...
    (Focus-IDS)
  • Re: IPS/IDS behavior with ISIC/UDPSIC/TCPSIC/ICMPSIC traffic
    ... I am not aware of whether NSS has or not the DDOS attacks in its list, ... Rate of traffic (earlier i worked with Intoto IPS and it has this type ... does not lies in detecting at DDOSed ... ISIC generates many packets with different IP protocols. ...
    (Focus-IDS)
  • RE: False Positives with IntruVert
    ... Subject: False Positives with IntruVert ... a different statement than IPS is not functional or not worth time or money. ... prevent attacks, ... profiled the attacks (signature or anomaly or combination of both)) has ...
    (Focus-IDS)
  • Re: IPS/IDS behavior with ISIC/UDPSIC/TCPSIC/ICMPSIC traffic
    ... considered as an attack that need to be protected by IPS devices? ... ISIC generates many packets with different IP protocols. ... If you still see 100% CPU problem, you may like to check you log settings. ... with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. ...
    (Focus-IDS)
  • RE: False Positives with IntruVert
    ... right on defense for IPS that I have seen. ... Subject: False Positives with IntruVert ... There are clearly attacks that will 100% not false positive. ...
    (Focus-IDS)