Re: TrafficIQ HTTP IE traffic coverage
- From: Devdas Bhagat <devdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:02:24 +0530
On 10/10/06 13:10 +0530, SanjayR wrote:
<snip>
signatures are not required!!!). One is going to a site which
contains a malicious file that causes IE to crash. so what..don't go
or don't download that.. anyway that file is bad.
Uhm, and then someone has a nice, Javascripted link to it somewhere else?
If you use IE (including any of the rendering components), then you can
be threatened by any attack on them.
If my assumption is correct and justified, then TrafficIQ, as an
IDS/IPS evaluation tool, should not contain such traffic. Such
Why? Malicious files can be transferred in any way, and deployed to IE,
not necessarily only via port 80.
traffic, as such, does not evaluate capabilities of an IDS/IPS
effectively. Has TrafficIQ included such traffic just to advertise
its high number of various attacks?
This should be detectable. AFAIK, many other programs use the IE
rendering engine to render HTML, including Outlook and Outlook Express.
A DoS attack against the rendering engine couldcome in via a carefully
crafted HTML message.
Devdas Bhagat
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS
Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- TrafficIQ HTTP IE traffic coverage
- From: SanjayR
- TrafficIQ HTTP IE traffic coverage
- Prev by Date: Tools to help incident response
- Next by Date: RE: [lists] New IPS testing methodology
- Previous by thread: Re: TrafficIQ HTTP IE traffic coverage
- Next by thread: Re: Re: TrafficIQ HTTP IE traffic coverage
- Index(es):