RE: Denial of Service: Commercial Defense products

From: Nathan Davidson (ndavidso_at_globix.com)
Date: 11/24/05

  • Next message: FinAckSyn: "RE: Denial of Service: Commercial Defense products" 
    Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:35:41 -0500
To: "Joel Friedman" <jfriedman@datapipe.com>, <focus-ids@securityfocus.com>

    I performed the same tests and larger on the Toplayer 5500-1000 with virtually zero latentcy. Throughput is very important, so is the size of your pipe and the ability to finely tune policy. This is why I think the Toplayer is a good choice for most implmentations.
     
    IMHO the Riverhead and Arbor are also good products for ISPs looking to do a large backbone deployment as they can dynamically change routing in the network based on anomily detection (this also means extra equipment is required). Whilst the Toplayer is good for proxy based and point solutions, bare in mind that a point solution can be a multi gig pipe.
     
     

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Joel Friedman [mailto:jfriedman@datapipe.com]
            Sent: Wed 23/11/2005 20:07
            To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com
            Cc:
            Subject: RE: Denial of Service: Commercial Defense products
            
            

  • Next message: FinAckSyn: "RE: Denial of Service: Commercial Defense products"
    • Quantcast