Re: Cisco IDS 4250 vs Sourcefire IS3000 + RNA Sensor
From: Teemu Schaabl (teemu_at_lynix.net)
Date: 10/14/05
- Previous message: zero: "Current IDS problems"
- In reply to: Jonathan Gauntt: "Cisco IDS 4250 vs Sourcefire IS3000 + RNA Sensor"
- Next in thread: Gary Halleen (ghalleen): "RE: Cisco IDS 4250 vs Sourcefire IS3000 + RNA Sensor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 20:24:50 +0200 To: Jonathan Gauntt <jon0966@yahoo.com>
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Gauntt(jon0966@yahoo.com)@2005.10.12 11:57:00 +0000:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently running a Cisco IDS 4250 that monitors our internal
> traffic. We essentially use this device for historical reporting because we
> are a medical oriented facility with at least 100 3rd party connections to
> us besides the 8000 employees.
>
> I am considering upgrading the Cisco IDS 4250 to the XL to handle higher
> throughput but have been evaluating the Sourcefire IS300 and their RNA
> sensor.
>
> I have the ability to purchase the Sourcefire unit or upgrade the 4250.
>
> Sourcefire claims that they are superior with state full IDS inspection and
> an overall better product.
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts on these two products? I have about $100k in
> my budget to spend.
>
try out http://www.nss.co.uk/download/download.htm, you can read testimonial
of at least the sourcefire appliances (maybe not the exact one, you're searching
for, but at least about the involved technology)
regards,
teemu
-- "Every man takes the limits of his own field of vision for the limits of the world." - Schopenhauer
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: zero: "Current IDS problems"
- In reply to: Jonathan Gauntt: "Cisco IDS 4250 vs Sourcefire IS3000 + RNA Sensor"
- Next in thread: Gary Halleen (ghalleen): "RE: Cisco IDS 4250 vs Sourcefire IS3000 + RNA Sensor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]