RE: Intrushield vs. ISS once more...

From: Eric Hines (eric.hines_at_appliedwatch.com)
Date: 12/28/04

  • Next message: wnorth: "RE: Intrushield vs. ISS once more..."
    To: "'Brito, Nelson (ISS Brazil)'" <NBrito@iss.net>, "'Murtland, Jerry'" <MurtlandJ@Grangeinsurance.com>, "'Jacob Winston'" <jctx09@yahoo.com>, <focus-ids@securityfocus.com>
    Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:15:16 -0600
    
    

    I'll throw my 2 cents in here just for fun.

    1) ISS engineers have told me time and time again that turning on the
    "packet capture" capabilities, which I think ANY IDS/IPS should
    automatically be able to provide without turning on, was not recommended.
    That is, the performance hit would be too great when these features were
    enabled. I don't understand, does ISS really expect us to believe ISS when
    it says it's detected a particular attack? By default, not allowing the user
    to see the packet is a pretty bold statement from ISS that it doesn't expect
    to see any false positives. When ISS acquired NetworkICE I had really
    expected Robert Graham to come in and clean up RealSecure.

    2) The Trons functionality you speak of, again, is not recommended for use
    due to the impact that has on performance when using too many Snort
    signatures.

    I reiterate that these are not my opinions, rather, what was said to me when
    I last sat in on an ISS sales presentation with several SE's present.

    Regards,

    Eric Hines, GCIA, CISSP
    CEO, President
    Applied Watch Technologies, Inc.

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    Eric Hines, GCIA, CISSP Toll Free: (877) 262-7593
    CEO, President Direct: (877) 262-7593 x327
    Applied Watch Technologies, Inc. Fax: (877) 262-7593
    1134 N. Main St. Web: www.appliedwatch.com
    Algonquin, IL 60102

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    "Browserless Enterprise Snort Management is Finally Here"
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Brito, Nelson (ISS Brazil) [mailto:NBrito@iss.net]
    Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 9:28 AM
    To: Murtland, Jerry; Jacob Winston; focus-ids@securityfocus.com
    Subject: RE: Intrushield vs. ISS once more...

    I have been asked about those features and what I say is:
    "ISS is fully compatible with Ethereal and TCPDump captured files, you just
    have to turn-on the response for this in the policy (aka LOG EVIDENCE)."
      
    You can also use TRONS, snort's style signatures, or even User Defined
    signatures that uses regex. So you are able to write your own signatures.
    ;-)
      
    Just to let you all know, before reviewing any IDS/IPS, ask the manufacture
    about the advanced configurations, I can bet that for whoever you ask about,
    they will be glad to assist you as they can.

    - nb

    Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.
    Feliz Navidad y Próspero Año Nuevo.
    Feliz Natal e Próspero Ano Novo.

    {(!($^O=~/^[M]*$32/i)&&($0=~s!^.*/!!))||($0=~s!.*\\!!)}print$0;

     

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Murtland, Jerry [mailto:MurtlandJ@Grangeinsurance.com]
    Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 6:20 PM
    To: 'Jacob Winston'; focus-ids@securityfocus.com
    Subject: RE: Intrushield vs. ISS once more...

    Personally, I reviewed ISS along with Cisco's IDS, NetScreen's and a few
    other's. Last week I decided on NetScreen because of it's ease of use (just
    like a firewall), and it's compatibility with key software like
    Ethereal/TCPDump. The amount of information it gives you isn't bad although
    like ISS and a few others, you will get the occasional alert that really
    just doesn't give you enough to go on, so you have to count on other things
    like netscout or a packet sniffing package to do some analysis.

    I thought ISS was great also, but I also thought that there were too many
    steps to get things done. The interface was a little convoluted and you
    were entirely dependant on ISS's X-Force team to write your new signatures.
    With NetScreen's Snort engine, I can write my own signatures. Not to
    mention, since they were just bought by Juniper, I'm sure their funding for
    new development will surge. Not trying to sell you on anything, just
    offering my own opinion on what I experienced.

    I'm not sold on anyone's technology as far as IPS goes, but I would look for
    the ability to granularly step into that technology when I decided to block
    specific traffic patterns in the future.

    Jerry J. Murtland, CISSP

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Jacob Winston [mailto:jctx09@yahoo.com]
    Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 8:49 PM
    To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com
    Subject: Intrushield vs. ISS once more...

    I have been evaluating Intrushield and ISS but am still unsure on which
    route to take. Does anyone have compelling info on why Intrushield is better
    or vice-versa? Any help is appreciated.

    Thank you in advance.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Test Your IDS

    Is your IDS deployed correctly?
    Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
    CORE IMPACT.
    Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
    to learn more.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Test Your IDS

    Is your IDS deployed correctly?
    Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
    CORE IMPACT.
    Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
    to learn more.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Test Your IDS

    Is your IDS deployed correctly?
    Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
    CORE IMPACT.
    Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
    to learn more.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Test Your IDS

    Is your IDS deployed correctly?
    Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from
    CORE IMPACT.
    Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
    to learn more.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------


  • Next message: wnorth: "RE: Intrushield vs. ISS once more..."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider
      ... "A potential hacker can read how the signatures work, ... before you ask ISS to release their codebase for their signature ... >Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, ... >CORE IMPACT. ...
      (Focus-IDS)
    • RE: IDS vs. IPS deployment feedback
      ... claiming that ISS uses 1. ... asked for an example in which Snort used more signatures to provide ... agree that they handle exactly what the Snort rules are doing. ... You state that Snort uses 300 rules to cover one vulnerability while ...
      (Focus-IDS)
    • Re: How to choose an IDS/FW MSS provider
      ... "A potential hacker can read how the signatures work, ... before you ask ISS to release their codebase for their signature ... >Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE ... >CORE IMPACT. ...
      (Focus-IDS)
    • RE: Editing ISS RealSecure Network Sensor policy from commandline
      ... Editing ISS RealSecure Network Sensor policy from ... >Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from ... >CORE IMPACT. ...
      (Focus-IDS)
    • Re: Intrushield vs. ISS once more...
      ... Assuming you have an evaluation copy of each, you could run the CRI ... against it and see what that does for you...I know ISS passes, ... >Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from ... >CORE IMPACT. ...
      (Focus-IDS)

  • Quantcast