Re: port bonding and taps
From: Sam f. Stover (sstover_at_iwc.sytexinc.com)
Date: 10/02/03
- Previous message: Ron Gula: "RE: Network hardware IPS"
- In reply to: PPowenski_at_oag.com: "RE: port bonding and taps"
- Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: port bonding and taps"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: port bonding and taps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:34:23 -0400 To: PPowenski@oag.com
On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 11:00 AM, PPowenski@oag.com wrote:
> I am using channel bonding with RH 9 and it works great
That's awesome - could you let us know what kind of bandwidth you are
handling? I looked at this some time ago, but had some real concerns
about what kind of traffic it could handle. I never really put it to
the test though, so I can't speak authoritatively.
Also, is there a way to know if you are dropping frames on the bonded
interface? Or do you have to query the individual card statistics,
just like anything else?
____
S.f.Stover
sstover@iwc.sytexinc.com
- application/pgp-signature attachment: PGP.sig
- Previous message: Ron Gula: "RE: Network hardware IPS"
- In reply to: PPowenski_at_oag.com: "RE: port bonding and taps"
- Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: port bonding and taps"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: port bonding and taps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading