Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform
From: Ron Gula (rgula_at_tenablesecurity.com)
Date: 08/27/03
- Previous message: Shaiful: "Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform"
- In reply to: Shaiful: "Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:33:24 -0400 To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com
Of course,
Look at companies like IPolicy. They make extensive use of ASICs and FPGAs,
but have a completely flexible underlying architecture for updating how they
do network flow reconstruction, IDS, firewall, etc.
Ron Gula
At 01:49 AM 8/27/2003 -0700, Shaiful wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>Can we have the best of both worlds?
>
>With the emergence of network processors and the FPGA
>like devices that you can buy off-the-shelf, I think
>it is a very promising direction.
>
>Pls refer to the following links:
>
>Intel's Network Processor IXP family:
>http://www.intel.com/design/network/products/npfamily/
>
>Altera's Nios development kit
>http://www.altera.com/products/devkits/altera/kit-nios.html
>
>Tarari's content inspections processor
>http://www.tarari.com/index2.html
>
>Regards,
>Shaiful
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training Federal, September 29-30 (Training), October 1-2 (Briefings) in Tysons Corner, VA; the worlds premier
technical IT security event. Modeled after the famous Black Hat event in
Las Vegas! 6 tracks, 12 training sessions, top speakers and sponsors.
Symanetc is the Diamond sponsor. Early-bird registration ends September 6 Visit: www.blackhat.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Shaiful: "Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform"
- In reply to: Shaiful: "Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]