RE: Network IDS

From: Fergus Brooks (fergusb_at_evolve-online.com)
Date: 08/20/03

  • Next message: José Joaquín: "Re: Network IDS"
    To: "'Duston Sickler'" <dustons@charter.net>, <focus-ids@securityfocus.com>
    Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:04:04 +0800
    
    

    Big brother is watching so I'll be careful.

    I have had a fair amount of exposure to the Symantec Gateway Security
    boxes and can offer a few comments.

    The SGS is a combination of Raptor firewall (Symantec Enterprise
    Firewall), gateway AV scanner and signature-based Network IDS with some
    content filtering as well.

    It runs on hardened Linux but is sold as an appliance - there is a VT100
    terminal as part of the console and though you shouldn't have to access
    that - however advanced troubleshooting may require access to the
    operating system.

    Unfortunately I have found the IDS to be fairly token. I believe there
    are only around 1000 sigs and the updates are not that frequent. It is
    certainly not in the league of Symantec's own enterprise NIDS Manhunt.
    It really is a value add to the Raptor firewall, which is an excellent
    application-layer firewall and also the Norton gateway AV is top notch.

    I do think it is a great solution for smaller size businesses - it is
    certainly very easy to manage and configure. I have heard there are some
    enterprise-capable boxes on the way. They also ship with Rainwall
    clustering/HA (at an extra cost of course!) so they can scale etc.

    So in summary if you are *only looking for an IDS* then the SGS is not
    for you. It is a good all-in-one solution. I don't know too much about
    Windows IDS systems so I'll leave the recommendations to others on this
    list.

    Rgds...

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Duston Sickler [mailto:dustons@charter.net]
    Sent: Saturday, 16 August 2003 11:48 PM
    To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com
    Subject: Network IDS

    Hello,

    I would like to thank in advance everyone who is out of the office. I
    really do like to hear about it.

    The Network Administrator for the company I work for has charged me to
    locate a Network Intrusion Detection System. We do have a monitored
    firewall between us and the outside world. We need something to protect
    our servers from anyone coming from the inside. We have about 20
    Windows 2000 Servers, 5 NT 4 Servers, and 250 Windows 2000/Thin Net
    workstations.

    We live in a 100% Windows world and the powers that be will not be
    receptive to any *nix solutions. We are more the willing to pay for a
    top of the line product as long is it is in fact top of the line.

    Currently I have been looking at the Symantec Gateway Device. We like
    the idea of a stand alone piece of hardware. The only problem is we
    already have a gateway server washing our email of viruses and 99% of
    Spam.

    Does anyone have any comments on the Symantec Gateway device? We have
    had excellent experiences with there Gateway software and NAV Corp.
    Does anyone have a different or better device that they could point me
    towards?

    I would like to thank everyone who replies to this post. I have learned
    a great deal being on this list the last year and will continue to
    appreciate all the expertise that is freely given here.

    Duston Sickler
    CompTIA A+ Certified
    "Cedo nulli."

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ---
    Captus Networks - Integrated Intrusion Prevention and Traffic Shaping  
     - Instantly Stop DoS/DDoS Attacks, Worms & Port Scans
     - Automatically Control P2P, IM and Spam Traffic
     - Ensure Reliable Performance of Mission Critical Applications
    Precisely Define and Implement Network Security and Performance Policies
    **FREE Vulnerability Assessment Toolkit - WhitePapers - Live Demo Visit
    us at: http://www.captusnetworks.com/ads/31.htm
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ---
    --
    This message has been scanned by AVMail
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training Federal, September 29-30 (Training), October 1-2 (Briefings) in Tysons Corner, VA; the worldÂ’s premier 
    technical IT security event.  Modeled after the famous Black Hat event in 
    Las Vegas! 6 tracks, 12 training sessions, top speakers and sponsors.  
    Symanetc is the Diamond sponsor.  Early-bird registration ends September 6 Visit: www.blackhat.com
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    

  • Next message: José Joaquín: "Re: Network IDS"

    Relevant Pages

    • Virtual LAN Problem
      ... It is connected to the Internet via Symantec Gateway 360R. ... I have installed and tested the second Symantec Gateway 360R. ... I cannot see the machines at remote from the Server Management Computers ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: [SLE] connection redundancy
      ... which is the router just this side of the ... >>because it's own gateway is still up. ... You'll also need three network cards to put into this Linux box. ... your internal LAN can route packets to the Internet. ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Cant access secure Web pages
      ... and which need to be contacted via the Default Gateway. ... The Default Gateway being the software process that does the network ... Gateway (as set up by your ISP's DHCP packet to the router), ... me so I can send it directly (to the MAC address discovered by ARP). ...
      (uk.comp.sys.mac)
    • Re: Problem with Cable Moden & Router.
      ... gateway is the way in or out. ... a gateway leads to another network. ... Where two routes with different network masks overlap ...
      (comp.os.linux.misc)
    • Re: [9fans] Do we have a catalog of 9P servers?
      ... experience with plan 9 to comment with any sort of authority. ... redundant resources on the gateway. ... gateway and the host on the internal network. ... "Whoa, here comes a network, we're going to need some more syscalls!" ...
      (comp.os.plan9)