Re: IDS is dead, etc
From: Jonathan Rickman (jonathan_at_xcorps.net)
Date: 08/13/03
- Previous message: Peter Baker: "Protocol Anomaly and Issues"
- In reply to: Omar Herrera: "RE: IDS is dead, etc"
- Next in thread: Paul Schmehl: "Re: IDS is dead, etc"
- Reply: Paul Schmehl: "Re: IDS is dead, etc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: focus-ids@securityfocus.com Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:22:20 -0400
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 01:01, Omar Herrera wrote:
> The key is "correlation", and right now I don't se a better security
> solution than a well prepared security professional to correlate that.
I think that will remain the case for a long time to come. After all,
security is a process. The process involves technical and human factors.
Attempting to engineer people out of the process will ultimately fail.
Systems only have two possible answers to any given question...yes or no.
People can respond with very detailed conditional responses. Never
underestimate the power of maybe, if, but, and or.
-- Jonathan Rickman X Corps Security http://www.xcorps.net --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Captus Networks - Integrated Intrusion Prevention and Traffic Shaping - Instantly Stop DoS/DDoS Attacks, Worms & Port Scans - Automatically Control P2P, IM and Spam Traffic - Ensure Reliable Performance of Mission Critical Applications Precisely Define and Implement Network Security and Performance Policies **FREE Vulnerability Assessment Toolkit - WhitePapers - Live Demo Visit us at: http://www.captusnetworks.com/ads/31.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: Peter Baker: "Protocol Anomaly and Issues"
- In reply to: Omar Herrera: "RE: IDS is dead, etc"
- Next in thread: Paul Schmehl: "Re: IDS is dead, etc"
- Reply: Paul Schmehl: "Re: IDS is dead, etc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
